grayscale photo of man with shop bags walking past beggar siting on sidewalk

We Are Heading Towards Post-Capitalism And It’s Not OK

No one remembers the names of the laborers who helped assemble the first Model T car in Henry Ford’s factories. You don’t need to be a prodigy to be part of a revolution; you just need to show up and do your job well enough to push the system forward.

Our current socio-economic evolution mirrors this. We’re moving steadily towards a post-capitalist system shaped not by visionaries but by workers reluctantly or unknowingly carrying the tools of change. And yet, what once might have been seen as progress begins to reveal cracks in its moral and functional foundation.

The Rise of Post-Capitalism

Post-capitalism is not a concept out of a manifesto or a utopian dream; it is a pattern visible in the intertwining of technology, economics, and culture. It reflects a system where traditional capitalism is starting to replace itself with something unstructured and nonlinear. Self-service apps replace service workers, algorithms drive purchasing trends, and massive open online content replaces formal education systems—economies are shifting into forms that prioritize automated efficiency over human value.

It’s crucial to understand, though, that post-capitalism isn’t a system designed to liberate—it’s designed for expediency. It thrives on data extraction, precarity, and the monetization of attention. In many cases, it exploits cracks in traditional capitalism under the guise of technological progress.

Technology is the Midwife, Not the Architect

Kevin Kelly once described technology as a species evolving to use humanity as its tool for growth. Technology is not the mastermind; it simply adapts to the opportunities its users provide. The tech leaders pushing us toward post-capitalism are not visionaries—they’re persistent enough to show up, take advantage of existing systems, and allow technology to proliferate in ways that serve its own ends.

The gig economy didn’t arise because a few innovators had profound insight into the future of work. It came from exploiting inefficiencies in full-time employment and traditional labor laws. Similarly, algorithm-driven content curation on platforms like Instagram or TikTok is less about connecting people and more about coaxing prolonged engagement to sell advertising. These movements are not led by geniuses—they are spearheaded by opportunists who understand how to game the system well enough.

Post-Capitalism and the Decline of Human-Centric Systems

Under capitalism, wealth exploited labor, and at least labor was tied to human output. Now, in post-capitalism, human input becomes secondary to technological facilitation. The rise of automation blinds us to the fact that technology doesn’t work without human direction. It’s easy to mistake the shiny veneer of an AI-powered future as progress, but is it really progress if the systems that support them thrive on gig labor and precarious economies?

We’re creating systems that reward scale over substance and cold calculation over empathy. When algorithms determine which products thrive, art or culture isn’t streamlined for experience or emotional impact; it’s distilled into clickable, monetizable fragments. These shifts may seem superficial, but they represent a deeper devaluing of human-centric systems in favor of abstract metrics.

The Role of Data and Power

If capitalism concentrated capital, post-capitalism concentrates data. The emphasis is no longer just on owning physical assets but on owning the rights to information. Companies like Amazon, Meta (Facebook), and Google don’t just control markets—they control the conversation, the behavior of billions, and feedback loops that strengthen their dominance. Their power goes unchecked, eroding government oversight in the absence of clear regulation around big data and algorithmic decision-making.

When data becomes the commodity, we stop being merely consumers or workers under capitalism. We become the raw material of a new system where human behavior, preferences, and hopes are mined like coal, with just as little regard for what this extraction does to communities or individuals.

The Illusion of Empowerment

Post-capitalism is often marketed as empowering. Open platforms, freelance apps, and free online resources promise freedom from traditional structures. But the reality often looks more like surrendering autonomy to a system that benefits small clusters of power. Gig workers, for instance, aren’t empowered by being their own bosses—they’re often subjected to erratic incomes without benefits, oversight, or long-term security. The promises ring hollow the moment the curtain falls.

Meanwhile, the promises of democratized technology—such as open-source software or blockchain—are still tethered to economic forces that place power in the hands of executives and early adopters. The mechanics of post-capitalism favor those who arrive early and lock down opportunities before others can access them. That kind of winner-take-all mindset undermines the utopian promise of decentralization.

The Danger of Trading One Ill for Another

Post-capitalism lures us in by framing itself as the successor to capitalism’s failures, but it introduces vulnerabilities of its own. By putting technology at its center, it alienates us from human priorities—community, equity, creativity, and adaptability. Where capitalism was often exploitative but knowable, post-capitalism thrives on fragmentation and obscurity, making it hard to locate the levers of power and even harder to dismantle them.

Amid these shifts, we should remember: technology and systems are only tools, much like the team that helped deliver Marie Curie or Esperanza Spaulding. They don’t deserve to define the future—they are only facilitators, midwives for what comes next. And what comes next should be a choice informed by justice, humanity, and balance—not just expediency or optimization.

“`

By cdbits